Exclusive: Epstein Survivors Say His Former Assistant Lesley Groff Lied to Congress
Sandego.net – Lesley Groff, the longtime assistant to Jeffrey Epstein, recently faced intense scrutiny after her statements to lawmakers were contradicted by several victims. During a session last month, Groff asserted that she had never personally encountered the girls and young women who provided massages to the financier. Furthermore, she claimed ignorance regarding their backgrounds and ages. However, a growing number of Epstein survivors are now voicing their disagreement with her account, suggesting that her testimony contained significant inaccuracies. This Exclusive report reveals how multiple survivors are challenging the narrative Groff presented to Congress.
In a series of interviews with CNN, multiple victims—including four women who spoke on the record and two who remained anonymous—highlighted various inconsistencies in Groff’s recent statements. These survivors described personal meetings with Groff, conversations where they discussed their ages, and instances where they received direct payments from the assistant, who served Epstein for eighteen years. These recollections stand in stark contrast to the narrative Groff presented to the House Oversight Committee during her extensive, transcribed interview on June 9. The Exclusive nature of these interviews provides fresh insight into the discrepancies.
Discrepancies in the Record
During her testimony before the committee, which has been actively questioning individuals connected to the convicted sex offender this year, Groff maintained that she was unaware of Epstein’s abuse of girls and women. She portrayed herself as someone who had been deceived by his manipulative nature. Although Groff was identified as a potential co-conspirator within the controversial non-prosecution agreement negotiated with federal prosecutors in Florida back in 2008, she has never faced criminal charges. Her legal representative did not provide a response to CNN’s inquiry regarding this matter.
Lesley Groff knew what was happening in Epstein’s inner circle, which is why Chairman Comer should have required her to testify under oath, said one survivor who spoke with CNN. Her testimony was incomplete and misleading.
Survivors Speak Out
The survivors who came forward shared detailed accounts of their interactions with Groff over the years. One victim recalled meeting Groff at Epstein’s Palm Beach residence, where they discussed her age and the nature of her work. Another survivor mentioned receiving payments directly from Groff for massage services provided to Epstein. These personal encounters directly contradict Groff’s claim that she had never met the girls and young women who worked for Epstein. The Exclusive interviews reveal a pattern of personal connections that Groff failed to acknowledge in her congressional testimony.
Furthermore, the survivors emphasized that Groff was not merely a passive observer in Epstein’s household. They described her as an active participant who facilitated arrangements and maintained relationships with the victims. Some survivors noted that Groff would often accompany them to appointments and was present during many of their interactions with Epstein. This level of involvement suggests that Groff had a more significant role in the operations of Epstein’s household than she admitted during her testimony.
The House Oversight Committee has been conducting a thorough investigation into Epstein’s network, and Groff’s testimony has become a focal point of their inquiry. Committee members have expressed concern about the accuracy of her statements, particularly given the number of survivors who have come forward with conflicting information. The Exclusive nature of these survivor accounts adds weight to the committee’s ongoing investigation and may influence future proceedings.
As the investigation continues, the survivors remain committed to ensuring that the truth about Epstein’s abuse is fully revealed. They believe that Groff’s testimony, while not entirely false, omitted crucial details that would have provided a more complete picture of her relationship with Epstein and his victims. The Exclusive interviews with these survivors highlight the importance of thorough congressional oversight and the need for accountability in cases of institutional failure.
