Jeffrey Epstein’s Former Assistant Accuses Three Men of Sexual Abuse
Here is who Epstein s longtime – As the House Oversight Committee delves deeper into the case of Jeffrey Epstein, attention has shifted to three individuals recently implicated by his former assistant, Sarah Kellen. In a recent interview, Kellen detailed allegations of sexual misconduct against these men, a revelation that has raised new questions about the networks surrounding Epstein. The testimony, delivered this week, marks a significant development in the ongoing inquiry into the late sex offender’s operations, according to sources close to the investigation.
New Allegations Against Epstein’s Associates
Kellen, who worked closely with Epstein for years, identified Frederic Fekkai, a French celebrity hairstylist; Philip Levine, a former mayor of Miami Beach and cruise industry executive; and Patrick Demarchelier, a renowned French fashion photographer, as those responsible for her abuse. The committee chair, James Comer, confirmed that Kellen’s interview included specific names, though he opted to withhold them initially. The accusations span multiple instances, with Kellen claiming that Fekkai and Levine engaged in sexual assault while Demarchelier exposed himself to her during their time together.
According to one source, the incidents involving Fekkai occurred in the early 2000s, before Kellen met Epstein. The pair was alone in a hotel room during a trip to Hawaii, where they met with modeling agents. Kellen described the event as a pivotal moment, stating that Fekkai’s actions were part of a pattern of behavior that later extended to her relationship with Epstein. Meanwhile, Levine’s alleged misconduct took place in St. Tropez, at a property rented by Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The location, a key hub for Epstein’s activities, has become central to the claims against him.
Kellen’s testimony has drawn mixed reactions. While some lawmakers view her as a critical witness, others question her credibility given her past role as a potential co-conspirator. In 2007, she was labeled by law enforcement as one of Epstein’s possible accomplices. However, she has since framed herself as a victim, describing her experience with Epstein as a complex web of manipulation and control. The House Oversight Committee’s current investigation suggests that her account may now serve as a new angle in uncovering the full scope of Epstein’s influence.
Statements from the Accused
Representatives of Fekkai and Levine have publicly denied the allegations. Mark Herr, a spokesperson for Fekkai, stated that the celebrity hairstylist was “astonished” by Kellen’s testimony. Herr asserted that Fekkai had “never abused anyone” and had “nothing to do with Epstein’s repugnant depravity or trafficking.” He further emphasized that the claim of assault was “categorically false.”
“Mr. Fekkai never assaulted anyone. He knew nothing about Epstein’s repugnant depravity or trafficking. He did nothing wrong,” Herr said in a statement.
Levine’s defense, meanwhile, highlighted his limited connection to Epstein. In a previous statement to WLRN, Levine claimed he had “only met Epstein a few times” and expressed regret over those encounters. “My only connection to Jeffrey Epstein arose solely through my former friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell,” he said. “I met Epstein only a few times. I never conducted business with him, never visited his island, and never flew on his aircraft. I regret ever meeting him,” he added, according to the media outlet.
Demarchelier, who passed away in 2022, has not been directly implicated in the allegations. However, Kellen testified that the fashion photographer played a role in introducing her to Epstein. Her account suggests that Demarchelier’s involvement may have been instrumental in shaping her early interactions with the financier. Despite this, there is no clear evidence in the publicly available Epstein files that Demarchelier had been interviewed by federal investigators prior to Kellen’s testimony.
The Role of Kellen in Epstein’s Network
Kellen’s position within Epstein’s circle has been both a source of controversy and a key element of the current investigation. Her access to sensitive information allowed her to provide lawmakers with detailed insights into Epstein’s activities. Yet, her role has also been scrutinized, as she was once considered a potential co-conspirator. The committee’s latest focus on her allegations indicates a shift in how her testimony is being evaluated.
Comer noted that Kellen’s interview was a critical piece of evidence, offering investigators a new lead. The committee had not previously known of the sexual abuse claims against the three men, which underscores the importance of Kellen’s account in expanding the inquiry. Her personal experiences with Epstein, as described in her opening statement, paint a vivid picture of his manipulative tactics.
“He groomed me, sexually and psychologically abused me, controlled me, manipulated me, dominated me, and gaslit me until I could no longer tell which thoughts were mine and which were his,” Kellen told lawmakers, according to a copy of her statement.
Kellen’s words, likened to living under a “permanent virtual reality headset,” reveal the extent of Epstein’s influence. She emphasized how his power permeated every aspect of her life, from her job to her home. “I was reminded every day how powerful he was — how influential he was — and that to turn on him or disobey him would mean losing everything: my job, my home, everyone I knew in the world, even my life,” she recounted. These statements have added emotional weight to the allegations, framing them as not just legal claims but also personal trauma.
Epstein Files and the Scope of the Investigation
A review of the Epstein files by CNN found that Levine and Fekkai had longstanding ties to the late sex offender. The records, however, do not indicate any direct interaction between Demarchelier and Epstein, raising questions about the photographer’s involvement. The committee has yet to confirm whether any of the three men were interviewed by federal authorities, though Kellen’s testimony now provides a fresh opportunity for further scrutiny.
Kellen’s detailed account has also prompted a reevaluation of her role in Epstein’s operations. While she was once seen as a collaborator, her current narrative positions her as a whistleblower. This duality has led to debates about the credibility of her testimony. Comer, who has remained noncommittal about the names of the accused, emphasized the committee’s commitment to transparency. “We will release a transcript of Kellen’s interview as soon as possible,” he said, signaling the potential for public scrutiny of the details she shared.
As the investigation continues, the focus on Kellen’s allegations has sparked renewed interest in the broader network of Epstein’s associates. The three men named in her testimony represent a new layer of potential wrongdoing, adding complexity to the case. Their backgrounds — from haute couture to local politics — highlight the diverse connections Epstein maintained. The committee’s next steps will likely depend on whether these claims hold up under further examination, and how they fit into the larger picture of Epstein’s criminal activities.
