MPs reject call for under-16s social media ban, backing more flexible powers

MPs reject Australia-style social media ban for under-16s, opt for flexible powers

UK MPs have voted against a proposed social media restriction for minors, favoring adaptable regulations instead. The idea of banning platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat for children under 16 was first introduced in Australia last year, marking a pioneering effort. Similar proposals gained traction in the House of Lords earlier this month, but they faced rejection in the Commons.

Support and Concerns

While actor Hugh Grant endorsed the measure, children’s advocacy group NSPCC cautioned that a sweeping ban might push youth toward less regulated online spaces. The Conservatives argued for an immediate action, framing it as an “emergency” requiring legislative safeguards for young users. However, the Liberal Democrats criticized the lack of commitment, calling the decision “simply not good enough.”

“Many parents and campaign groups have called for an outright ban on social media for under-16s,” said Education Minister Olivia Bailey. “Others, including children’s charities, have warned that a blanket ban could drive children towards less regulated corners of the internet or leave teenagers unprepared when they do come online.”

Opposition also came from Molly Russell’s father, who highlighted the role of harmful online content in his daughter’s tragic suicide at 14. He urged the government to prioritize strict enforcement of current laws over new restrictions. The proposed ban was part of revisions to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, but Bailey urged MPs to support more nuanced measures.

Consultation and Alternative Plans

To address concerns, the government initiated a consultation to gather input on shaping future policies. This includes evaluating whether platforms should enforce minimum age checks and disable addictive features like autoplay. Science Secretary Liz Kendall would gain authority to restrict or ban access for specific age groups and limit harmful functionalities.

Conservative former minister Lord Nash expressed disappointment, stating the Commons’ vote “gambled on half measures.” He emphasized the need for stronger controls, akin to drug regulations, to protect children from online risks. Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat education spokesperson Munira Wilson accused the government of “failing to grasp the issue,” urging concrete action over prolonged discussions.

Political Divisions

During the debate, Labour MPs, including Sadik Al-Hassan of North Somerset, abstained from voting. Al-Hassan compared social media to a drug, arguing: “Parents like me are locked in a daily battle they cannot win alone, fighting platforms designed to keep children hooked. If a drug caused such harm for 78%, it would be withdrawn or restricted. The same logic must apply here.”

Labour’s hesitation contrasts with Conservative calls for stricter policies, such as limiting phone use in schools. Despite the rejection, the door to a ban remains open, with MPs supporting flexible restrictions while the government continues its consultation process.