An agreement on the Strait of Hormuz is taking shape – but not one Trump wants

2 hours ago  ·  4 min read
By Jennifer Johnson - sandego.net
khrisna-edit-1785963788-9953d1b71d

An Agreement on the Strait of Hormuz Takes Shape

Sandego.net – An agreement on the Strait of Hormuz is emerging as a central diplomatic achievement, though not in the form President Donald Trump envisions. The maritime chokepoint has become a focal point for negotiations between Iran and Oman, with both sides working toward a temporary framework that could reshape regional security dynamics. While the prospect of resolution has generated optimism, significant hurdles remain before any comprehensive deal can be finalized.

Conflicting Signals Complicate Progress

President Trump has expressed considerable confidence that a breakthrough could materialize within days, reflecting the urgency that has characterized recent diplomatic efforts. His comments emphasized that substantial groundwork has already been laid, with Iranian counterparts reaching out directly to propose further dialogue. Despite this positive momentum, Trump maintained his position that military action remains an option if negotiations fail to produce results.

Complicating matters is the question of which parties are actually engaged in meaningful discussions. Tehran has consistently maintained that its negotiations are conducted exclusively with Oman, focusing on establishing a temporary framework for managing the critical waterway. This bilateral approach contrasts with broader regional expectations that multiple Gulf states might play more active roles in the process.

Insiders familiar with the ongoing talks estimate roughly equal probabilities that an agreement will be reached by the end of the week. However, one significant structural challenge involves the absence of representatives from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. This powerful military institution must ultimately approve any final arrangement, and its exclusion from current discussions creates uncertainty about implementation.

The main reason for the delay in reaching an agreement with Oman regarding the Strait of Hormuz is US interference and Trump’s threats.

This assessment came from an informed source cited by Tasnim, Iran’s semi-official news agency. Similar sentiments were echoed by Fars, another state-aligned publication, which noted that American officials have occasionally sent contradictory messages through various channels. These mixed signals have reportedly disrupted the momentum of negotiations, raising concerns that external obstruction could extend the timeline significantly.

The Middle Corridor Proposal

At the heart of the current proposal is the concept of a middle corridor. This arrangement would merge existing routes through both Iranian and Omani territorial waters into a unified passage. Such a configuration would allow Iran to maintain substantial influence over maritime traffic while addressing Oman’s security and economic interests. The terminology surrounding this arrangement reveals deeper tensions, particularly regarding what constitutes Iranian rights in the region.

The negotiations have focused on transforming the southern route, which passes through Omani waters, and the northern route, which passes through Iran’s territorial waters, into an intermediate route that serves the considerations and interests of both coastal states.

Esmaeil Baghaei, a spokesperson for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, explained that the proposed corridor would feature a two-way route rather than maintaining separate passages. This structural change represents a significant departure from the pre-war arrangement, when no single nation exercised meaningful control over shipping through the strait. Iranian officials emphasize that security operations, de-mining activities, and maritime services should remain under Iranian management.

Saeed Ajorlu, a member of Iran’s negotiating team, outlined Tehran’s vision for a temporary arrangement lasting between one and three months. During this period, Iran would exercise dominant control over the waterway. This level of authority presents potential challenges for acceptance in Washington and various Gulf capitals, where American influence remains substantial.

The economic dimensions of the conflict add another layer of complexity. Oil companies have benefited considerably from the ongoing tensions between the United States and Iran. This financial reality creates political pressure for Trump to secure a favorable outcome that maintains American leverage while preventing excessive Iranian control.

If we create a precedent in the Middle East where a nation state can decide that they are going to control an international waterway, charge a toll and if you don’t pay them blow up your ships, we have created a very dangerous precedent, which will repeat itself in other parts of the world.

What Comes Next

The path forward requires balancing competing interests while maintaining momentum. Both sides have demonstrated willingness to compromise, but the final agreement must satisfy domestic political requirements in Tehran and Washington. The coming days will be critical in determining whether an agreement on the Strait can move from possibility to reality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the main parties negotiating the Strait of Hormuz agreement?

The primary negotiations are between Iran and Oman, though other Gulf states may eventually play larger roles. Iran has consistently maintained that its talks are conducted exclusively with Oman.

What is the proposed middle corridor?

The middle corridor would merge existing routes through both Iranian and Omani territorial waters into a unified passage, allowing Iran to maintain influence while addressing Oman’s security and economic interests.

How long would the temporary arrangement last?

According to Saeed Ajorlu, a member of Iran’s negotiating team, the temporary arrangement would last between one and three months, during which Iran would exercise dominant control over the waterway.

Why is the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps important to the negotiations?

The IRGC must ultimately approve any final arrangement, and its current exclusion from discussions creates uncertainty about implementation of any agreement on the Strait.

MORE FROM THIS CATEGORY